Zero-Trust Assessment
Zero-Trust Posture Assessment
Evidence-led review of identity flows, segmentation gaps, and privileged access paths across hybrid estates sized for mid-market scale.
₩8,500,000
Program narrative
Boundary Harbor maps trust boundaries against realistic attacker movement, then prioritizes fixes that reduce lateral exposure without freezing delivery teams. Workshops include control owners from networking, identity, and business applications so recommendations land in operational language.
Included focus areas
- Attack-path narratives tied to your topology (not generic heatmaps)
- Control mapping to ISO 27001 and KR privacy expectations
- Executive readout with capex-friendly sequencing
- Workbook for vendor-neutral architecture decisions
- RACI for identity, network, and endpoint owners
- 90-day quick wins vs phased hardening backlog
- Optional tabletop for crisis communications
Outcomes
- A ranked remediation backlog aligned to budget windows
- Shared vocabulary between security and infrastructure leads
- Clear ownership for identity lifecycle gaps
FAQ
Do you need agent deployment on every endpoint?
No. We start with control-plane telemetry you already collect and expand only where blind spots remain.
Is this a certification audit?
It is advisory. We highlight gaps and controls; formal attestation sits with your audit partner.
What is not included?
We do not renegotiate vendor contracts or perform hands-on firewall changes during the assessment window.
Client notes
The lateral-movement storyboards referenced our actual VLAN names—finally something our network lead did not dismiss as slide filler.
The ISO mapping appendix saved us two weeks of internal alignment. Still wish we had budgeted more time with plant OT teams up front.